Single community source: Show HN.
We noticed during the course of many many years of DBA related work that fixes to database issues and queries are always reactive. An entire database can fall over extremely quickly when an unbounded query grows without warning. Traditionally, DBAs hear complaints of slowness and follow a methodical process: - manually browse pg_stats or other database related performance internal tables - see which queries are slowest - figure out what indexes are missing - figure out which indexes are actually bad and slowing down writes - painstakingly implement a fix In the age of cheap intelligence, we…
Not summarised — no summariser is configured, so the text above is the source's own excerpt.
Discussion: the thread about this
| Age | -5.7 |
| Community engagement | 3.8 |
| Content type | 6 |
| Community signal | 4 |
| Unverified claim | -6 |
| Total | 2.1 |
These components add up to 2.0999999999999996, not 2.1. The total is what ordered your brief; the difference means a component was not recorded, so treat this breakdown as incomplete rather than as the whole reason.